manbytesgnu_site

Source files for manbytesgnu.org
git clone git://holbrook.no/manbytesgnu_site.git
Log | Files | Refs

commit 2b735deb4758e5ccab9f82c93c8f346b95adb874
parent 1124bd9c8cf6cc23d95968963b98718eb4f187df
Author: lash <dev@holbrook.no>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:27:25 +0100

Update dead baby links

Diffstat:
M.gitignore | 1+
Acontent.proposed/20240618_why_perl.rst | 0
Mcontent/20210421_web_shapshot.rst | 9+++++++--
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ __pycache__ output/ pelican/ simple/ +content.discarded/ diff --git a/content.proposed/20240618_why_perl.rst b/content.proposed/20240618_why_perl.rst diff --git a/content/20210421_web_shapshot.rst b/content/20210421_web_shapshot.rst @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ Proving what you link to ######################## :date: 2021-05-03 14:22 +:modified: 2024-06-19 16:21 :category: Archiving :author: Louis Holbrook :tags: web,hash,chromium @@ -15,7 +16,7 @@ When we send a link to someone, we are trusting that whoever is behind that link Also, when we bookmark the link for later retrieval. We are trusting that the entity will be serving that content at any time in the future that you may want it. -This may not be a huge problem if the page is merely a list of `dead baby jokes`_. They are objectively funny, of course. But you can also get along without them. +This may not be a huge problem if the page is merely a list of `dead baby jokes`_ [6]_. They are objectively funny, of course. But you can also get along without them. But what of the case of formal, scientific texts we may depend on, and that use citations from the web as part of their source material? Usually, they refer to a source by *link* and *date of retrieval*. This is not of much use unless the actual source and/or render they saw at that time also is available. @@ -135,7 +136,7 @@ This post makes use of several external links to articles. So as a final step, l Clicking on the "image" links, we see that thanks to the recent ubiquity of cookie nag boxes screaming "accept all" at you, those very boxes are now blocking the content we want to get at. So we will need more work to get to where we want by automation. But it's s start. -.. _dead baby jokes: https://dead-baby-joke.com/ +.. _dead baby jokes: https://thoughtcatalog.com/clint-conway/2016/08/50-of-the-funniest-dead-baby-jokes-of-all-time/ .. _Wayback Machine: https://archive.org @@ -166,6 +167,10 @@ Clicking on the "image" links, we see that thanks to the recent ubiquity of cook .. [5] Another important difference is that the book does not need to be *interpreted* by a *machine* in order to make sense for a human. Availability of tooling is definitely an equally important topic in this discussion. However this post limits focus to the actual data itself. .. + + .. [6] How ironic; that site is gone. And I don't have a snapshot. What a shame. I've changed the link to some different baby jokes. The original url was https://dead-baby-joke.com. + +.. .. _data availability: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.433.3480 .. _controversy: https://www.thelocal.se/20111109/37244/